Wikipedia Reliability

Wikipedia Reliability Worksheet Student: Ryan Leishman Article title: Illuminati Answer the following questions to see how reliable a Wikipedia article is. Start with the main page. Does it have any cleanup banners that have been placed there to indicate problems with the article? (A complete list is available at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Template_messages/ Cleanup.) Any one of the following cleanup banners means the article is an unreliable source: This article or section has multiple issues.      This article may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards.  X The neutrality of this article is disputed. The factual accuracy of this article is disputed. This needs copy editing for grammar, style, cohesion, tone or spelling. This may contain material not appropriate for an encyclopedia. This article only describes one highly specialized aspect of its associated subject. This article requires authentication or verification by an expert. This article or section needs to be updated. This article may not provide balanced geographical coverage on a region. This is missing citations or needs footnotes. This article does not cite any references or sources. Read through the article and see if it meets the following requirements: Is it written in a clear and organized way?   X   Is the tone neutral (not taking sides)?  X Are all important facts referenced (you're told where they come from)?  X  Does the information provided seem complete or does it look like there are gaps (or just one side of the story)?  X Scroll down to the article's References and open them in new windows or tabs. Do they seem like reliable sources? Reliable references: The Illuminati Order Possibly unreliable references: "The Enlightenment, Freemasonry, and The Illuminati" Definitely unreliable references: "The Barack Obama Illuminati Connection"   Click on the Discussion tab. How is the article rated on the Rating Scale http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_History/Assessment#Quality_scale  (Stub, Start, C, B, GA, A, FA)? What issues around the article are being discussed? Do any of them make you doubt the article's reliability? Some of the topics being discussed do make me feel like it could be unreliable, but then again you could say that these people are putting their own opinions in and one discussion was how to join the Illuminati so you know that it could be unreliable.   Based on the above questions, give the article an overall ranking of Reliable, Partially Reliable or Unreliable. You may use a Reliable article as a source (but remember that even if a Wikipedia article is reliable, it should never be your only source on a topic!) You may use a Partially Reliable article as a starting point for your research, and may use some of its references as sources, but do not us it as a source. You should not use an Unreliable article as a source or a starting point. Research the same topic in a different encyclopedia. How did you rank this article (Reliable, Partially Reliable or Unreliable)? Give at least three reasons to support your answer. 1.      I rank this article as partially reliable because not all of the sources on it were accurate sources. 2.      There was one source on it that was completely outrageous and had no true meaning to what the topic was about 3.      The other sources when you check them give you better information and more expanded information on the matter, but then you had those few that were just completely out there.